Virgin Care Ltd


Virgin Care has become a major player in the market for NHS services since it entered the healthcare market in 2010. Over the past seven years the company has been awarded contracts worth well over £2 billion, with several large contracts in community health. Virgin Care has probably been the most active private company in the area of NHS contracts for community health and in 2016 the company made the move into adult social care.

In early 2020, Virgin Care reports on its website that it operates over 400 NHS services around England; despite the scale of its business the company shows no signs of making a profit. Indeed, according to its accounts, since 2010 the company has recorded an annual loss in the UK. As Virgin Care Ltd makes no profit in the UK, the company pays no tax in the UK. However, Virgin Care Ltd is a small entity in Richard Branson’s Virgin empire. Virgin Care’s ultimate parent company is Virgin Group Holdings Ltd registered in the tax haven of the British Virgin Islands.


Since 2010 Virgin Care has successfully bid for a wide range of contracts to provide services in the NHS, including: primary care services – GP practices, urgent care centres, minor injury units and walk-in centres; intermediate care services; community services – wheelchair services, prison healthcare, sexual health, community hospitals, neuro-rehabilitation, frail/elderly care, health visiting, district nursing, services for children with complex mental, physical and sensory learning difficulties, end of life care; and social care services.

Many of these services are provided within large contracts that span both health and social care; Virgin has been one of the only private companies to bid for such large complex contracts.

In late 2017, Virgin Care Private was launched, the company's first venture in purely private healthcare. This business venture opened its first health and wellbeing centre in Birmingham in January 2018. This centre provides GP services, specialist consultations, diagnostics and tests and well-being services all on a pay-as-you-go service.

Community Care and social care targeted

Virgin Care’s strategy has been to target large contracts containing numerous services in the area of community health and social care and increase the use of digital technology to reduce costs.

In 2012, Virgin Care was the first private company to win a large contract for community services when it took over the provision of community care in Surrey under a five year contract and the provision of children’s services in Devon.

Since 2012, the company has won a number of large contracts covering community services, including ones in West Lancashire, Essex, North Kent, Wiltshire and in Bath and North East Somerset. In early 2020, Virgin Care reported that they "run more than 400 services across England."

When the Bath and North East Somerset contract was won in 2016, Virgin Care became the first private company to take over adult social care services, including social workers. The Essex contract won in 2017 also contains a large chunk of social care.

Virgin Care's experience in these large contracts puts the company in a good position in light of the changes planned for healthcare; a major aim of the Sustainability and Transformation Partnership (STP) programme begun in 2016 and the long-term plan published in early 2019 is to integrate health and social care to a greater extent and increase the use of digital technology. It gives the company experience in line with the integrated care systems (ICS) in the process of being put in place around England and championed in the long-term plan.

Strategy to reduce criticism

Virgin Care is well aware of the criticism its involvement in the NHS has garnered, in particular the fact that it pays no tax in the UK and its links to a tax haven. The issue of Virgin’s links to a tax haven was a major issue in its bid for a contract to run Bristol’s children’s community health services in 2015.

Virgin Care did not win the Bristol contract, but the issue of tax avoidance did not disappear. In 2016, campaigners reiterated their concerns over tax avoidance as well as other issues whilst campaigning against privatisation of community services in Bath and North East Somerset; Virgin Care was the preferred provider for this contract.

The campaigners were unsuccessful this time; in November 2016 Bath and North East Somerset CCG and the local council awarded the £700 million contract to Virgin Care. This was the first contract under which adult social care will be privatised. An interesting aspect of this contract, however, was that the CCG and the council involved have stated that a clause was included in the contract under which Virgin would reinvest any "financial surplus" in the service. Virgin Care appears to have agreed to forego its profits in order to obtain the contract. It also indicates the high level of unease surrounding the appointment of Virgin Care within the local area. It should be noted, however, that the phrase “financial surplus” is open to considerable interpretation and it might well be a meaningless clause in reality.

Legal challenges

Virgin Care has been very successful in winning contracts with the NHS, but if it does not win, the company will turn to the courts.

In 2016 the end of Virgin Care’s Surrey-wide community health contract loomed and the whole process of tendering began again. Interestingly, the CCGs in Surrey decided to split the large contract that had been run by Virgin Care, into smaller contracts.

Virgin Care bid for but did not win the Surrey-wide children's community care contract; this was awarded to an alliance between Surrey and Borders Partnership Foundation Trust and two social enterprises, CSH Surrey and First Community Health. The three year contract was worth £82 million. Previously Virgin Care had run these services together with CSH Surrey and First Community Health.

As a result of losing the tender bidding process, in November 2016 Virgin Care launched legal proceedings against all eight commissioning organisations involved in the contract. A spokesperson for Virgin Care told HSJ that concerns about “serious flaws in the procurement process” prompted the company to launch proceedings. Speaking about the contract when it was run by Virgin and the two social enterprises, Guildford and Waverley CCG’s Wellbeing and Health Scrutiny board said that children and young people had experienced “service variation with differing access for families…a well as gaps in service provision and variation in waiting times.”

In October 2017, the legal case was settled with a payout to Virgin Care. The full amount of the payout was undisclosed, however the Surrey Downs CCG noted in governing board papers that it had paid Virgin Care £328,000. Payment was made by the six CCGs and one council involved and an August 2018 article in the Guardian puts the overall figure paid to Virgin as approximately £2 million.

In December 2017, Virgin Care was awarded a five year contract for the 0-19 year healthy child programme by Lancashire County Council. However, following a legal challenge by the NHS trusts' who were currently carrying out the work a judge overturned the decision in June 2018 stating that the scoring process by the council was flawed. The NHS trusts' continued to run the service until April 2019 whilst the council re-evaluated the bids. In October 2018, following a re-evaluation of the bids, the council re-awarded the contract to Virgin Care.

Strategy in GP services

Originally Virgin Care was strong in the area of GP services, however when CCGs were set up the company reduced the number of GP surgeries substantially. In October 2012 Virgin Care announced that it would be taking over all jointly owned GP-provider companies, to give Virgin Group 100% ownership of Assura Medical. This meant that over 300 GPs would have to relinquish stakes in the GP provider companies.  At this point 358 surgeries were listed as being part of these provider companies.

The move by Virgin Care to acquire 100% ownership was reported to be due to possible conflicts of interest between GPs in the Virgin Care practices and the newly introduced CCGs. It appears that many GPs chose to take full control of the GP provider companies, rather than relinquish control to Virgin Care and by 2015, the number of contracts for primary care services, including GP services, held by Virgin Care had reduced substantially to 30, 19 of which were GP practices.

In recent years, Virgin Care has been awarded several contracts for GP surgeries, but this aspect of the business is much smaller than in 2012.

Virgin Care Private

In January 2018, Virgin Care Private, a new business venture from Virgin Care, opened its first health and wellbeing centre in Birmingham. This is a purely pay-as-you-go service with no NHS contracts and no need for private health insurance. This is a new departure for Virgin Care, but is one of a number of private GP and health services that have sprung up around the country taking advantage of the difficulties in getting GP appointments and long waits for services. Virgin Care Private allows a patient to jump queues if they have the money. The centre offers GP appointments, diagnostic tests, a range of specialist consultations, as well as psychological therapies.

The website provides some details of prices, for example: a GP appointment will cost £55; a dermatology consultation £220, a mole assessment £150 and mole removal a further £150; and an ENT consultation will cost £220.


Guardian article noted that Jeremy Hunt, the Health Secretary, pushed through the deal in Surrey.


Virgin Care's financial set-up has historically been very complicated with a number of active companies including Virgin Care Services Ltd, Virgin Care Ltd, Virgin Care Corporate Services Ltd and several limited liability partnerships (LLPs).  At present, Virgin Healthcare Holdings Ltd. is the parent of the Virgin Care Group of companies (the 'Care Group') and is the parent of Virgin Care Ltd, which is in turn the parent of Virgin Care Services Ltd. Over the years as contracts have come to an end several subsidiaries have ceased trading, including Virgin Care Provider Services Ltd in the financial year 2018/19.

The ultimate parent is Virgin Group Holdings Ltd registered in the British Virgin Islands whose beneficiaries are Richard Branson and his family. The British Virgin Islands are a tax haven and entities registered there pay no tax. As a result of the link with the British Virgin Islands, questions have been raised over whether tax would be paid in the UK if Virgin Care made a profit.

The companies contracts were originally spread between different companies, but now the majority of contracts are with Virgin Care Services Ltd and the primary care contracts are with a number of different LLPs, including Virgin Care Coventry LLP, Virgin Care Leeds LLP and Virgin Care Liverpool LLP.

Virgin Care Ltd turnover for the year ended 31 March 2019 was £40.6 million (2017: £40.9 million) with £24.9 million loss for the financial year (2018: £17.7 million loss) and no tax paid. According to the Virgin Care Ltd accounts, following the end of the Devon contract, this entity now provides back office function to other Virgin companies in 'the Care Group' and is the parent of Virgin Care Services Ltd.

Virgin Care Services Ltd turnover for the year ended 31 March 2019 was £248.8 million down from £256.8 million in 2018, and an operating profit of £503,390, but following a tax credit the final profit was £3.6 million (down from £6.9 million in 2018.)

The holding company Virgin Healthcare Holdings Ltd reported a loss of £17.4 million for the financial year ended 31 March 2019, £39.7 million in 2018. The company paid no corporation tax in this year.

The Virgin Healthcare group of companies has not paid corporation tax since their inception in 2010.


Virgin Care Ltd is registered in the UK, however, an analysis by Richard Murphy, a chartered accountant at Tax Research UK, found 13 holding companies, some of them offshore, between Virgin Care and its ultimate parent company, Virgin Group Holdings Ltd based in the tax haven of the British Virgin Islands. Virgin Group Holdings Ltd’s principal beneficiaries are Sir Richard Branson, reported to have a net worth of £2.7bn, and his family. According to Murphy’s analysis, this type of company structure makes it unlikely that Virgin Care will pay any tax in the UK in the foreseeable future.


According to Virgin Care the company operates over 400 NHS and social care services for the NHS including community-based intermediate NHS services, GP-led walk-in and healthcare centres, urgent care centres, out of hours care, community services and GP practices. According to data collected by the NHS Support Federation, since 2010 Virgin Care has won contracts for NHS work valued at around £2.5 billion. However, this is likely to be an underestimate as several contract awards have not been reported publicly or the monetary value of the contract has not been disclosed.

Community Services North Surrey and North East Hampshire

In September 2019, Virgin Care and Frimley Health NHS Foundation trust were jointly awarded three contracts, together worth £17 million per year to provide community health services across the North East Hampshire and Farnham and Surrey Heath areas.

The procurement was undertaken jointly by North East Hampshire and Farnham CCG and Surrey Heath CCG. The contracts will begin on 1 April 2020 and run until March 2025, with a possible extension to 2027.

Healthy Child Programme Lancashire

In December 2017 Virgin Care was awarded the five year contract for the 0-19 year healthy child programme in Lancashire by Lancashire County Council. The contract covers school nurses, health visitors and many other services for young people. Previously it was run by Lancashire Care Trust under a contract that expired at the end of March 2018.

In January 2018, the two incumbent trusts, Lancashire Care Foundation Trust and Blackpool Teaching Hospitals FT challenged the contract award. The challenge meant that the formal awarding of the contract was suspended for several months. The case was heard by the Technology and Construction court, which deals with procurement disputes. The two trusts had submitted a joint bid for the contract.

In June 2018, the decision by Lancashire county council to award this £104 million contract was thrown out by a high court judge following the legal challenge from NHS trusts. The local authority’s process was deemed to be flawed in awarding this contract to Virgin Care. The judge, Justice Stuart-Smith, stated the council’s decision to score Virgin’s bid more highly than that of the NHS trusts’ was not substantially supported in its notes of the scoring procedure.

The trusts’ were granted an extension for providing services until April 2019 whilst legal proceedings continued and the council said this would stay in place whilst they considered their options. However, when the bids were re-evaluated overseen by an independent panel in October 2018, the council re-awarded the contract to Virgin Care.

West Lancashire urgent care and community care

Virgin Care was awarded two five-year contracts together worth £65 million in December 2016 by West Lancashire CCG. The community health services contract is worth £45 million and the urgent care services is worth £20 million; both started on 1 April 2017.

The services include district nurses, community matrons, IV therapy, end of life teams, GP out of hours and walk-in centres. The current provider, Southport and Ormskirk Hospital NHS Trust, was not shortlisted for the contracts.

Essex County Council Children's services

In November 2016, Essex County Council awarded a seven year contract to Virgin Care, in partnership with Barnardo’s, to run its Pre-Birth to 19 Health, Wellbeing and Family Support Service across Essex.  The contract began in April 2017.

The new service combines a range of existing services, including the Healthy Child Programme, Healthy Schools, Family Nurse Partnership and children’s centres. This contract contains social care as well as health care.

The contract is worth £354.6 million, but if further services are added and an extension of three years, the contract could be worth over £800 million.

In West Essex, the service was jointly commissioned with NHS West Essex Clinical Commissioning Group and will also include children’s community nursing, paediatrics, therapies and specialist services.

Luton MSK Service

In October 2016, Virgin Care was awarded the contract for an integrated Community musculoskeletal (MSK) Service by Luton CCG.  The MSK Service will provide a single point of contact for GPs and other healthcare professionals to refer MSK related presentations. Clinically appropriate referrals will be triaged as necessary to physiotherapy, pain management, orthopaedic and rheumatology pathways. The contract is worth £5.5 million and is five years long.

Bath and North Somerset health and social care

In August 2016 Virgin Care was chosen as preferred bidder to take on a seven year contract, worth around £700 million with an option to extend for three years, to coordinate over 200 health and social care services in Bath and North Somerset. The contract was awarded in November 2016 despite substantial opposition. This is a prime provider contract with Virgin Care directly delivering and coordinating services, but with the option to subcontract to other providers where appropriate.

Virgin Care was chosen over a consortium led by the social enterprise Sirona Care and Health, which included Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership Trust, Royal United Hospitals Bath Foundation Trust, Dorothy House Hospice Care, and the GP organisation Bath and North East Somerset Enhanced Medical Services.

Under the contract, in April 2017, Virgin Care began running three statutory services – adult social care, continuing healthcare and children’s community health – from April 2017.

The deal marks the first time a council’s core adult social work services will be directly delivered by a for-profit private firm. Previous outsourcing by councils have seen social work run by local authority-owned trading companies or not-for-profit social enterprises that have been spun out of social services departments.

A range of non-statutory services such as public health nursing, integrated re-ablement and speech and language therapy are also included in the contract.

Due to the weight of opposition against Virgin Care being awarded the contract, additions were made to the contract. According to Councillor Vic Pritchard, cabinet member for adult social care and health at Bath and North East Somerset Council there is a clause in the contract that would require “any financial surplus made by the new prime provider to be reinvested into services in Bath and north east Somerset”. It is unclear whether this means the Virgin will operate not-for-profit as it should be noted that definitions of "financial surplus" can vary widely. The contract has been opposed by unions and social work leaders.

Sexual Health Services in the North East

Virgin Care was awarded the contract for integrated sexual health service across the boroughs of Hartlepool, Middlesbrough, Redcar and Cleveland and Stockton-on-Tees in May 2016 by the council's of these areas. The contract is for five years with an option to extend to nine years. The five year contract is worth £36.2 million.

Sexual health services in Cheshire West and Chester

In December 2018, local media reported that Virgin Care was to be awarded the contract for sexual health services in Cheshire West and Chester. The contract awarded by Chester Council under its public health remit will be worth £2.6 million. The previous contract was managed by East Cheshire CCG and the Royal Liverpool Hospital. Virgin Care began running the service in April 2019.

North Kent adult community services

In January 2016 Virgin won a bid to run adult community services across Dartford, Gravesham, Swanley and Swale region of North Kent. This seven year contract is worth £18 million per year and could be extended for an extra three years. Virgin Care will take the contract from Kent Community Health Foundation Trust, which reported that it lost out to Virgin Care in the area of price. Kent Community Health Foundation Trust, said it scored ”slightly higher” on quality in the assessment process.

In February 2016 Kent Community Health Foundation Trust questioned the commissioning CCGs (Swale and Dartford, Gravesham and Swanley) over their methodology in the selection procedure. In late February 2016 the Kent Trust began legal proceedings at the High Court challenging Dartford, Gravesham and Swanley CCG and Swale CCG. This challenge triggers an automatic suspension of the awarding of the contract until the case is settled or discontinued. In June 2016, however, the contract suspension was lifted and the contract could then be transferred to Virgin Care.

Community child health services in Wiltshire

In December 2015 Virgin Care won a £64 million, five-year contract, to provide community health services in Wiltshire for children, including children’s specialist community nursing, speech and language therapy and health visitors. The contract began in April 2016 and is worth £12.8 million per year.

Elderly care in East Staffordshire

Virgin Care won a £280 million contract in March 2015 to provide services for the frail and elderly in East Staffordshire. Virgin Care was to be the prime provider under this seven-year contract and could sub-contract the work to other organisations. This was a fixed-price contract.

In April 2019, Virgin announced that it would leave the contract entirely in April 2020, three years early. The reason given was that Virgin and the CCG were unable to come to a new financial agreement. Virgin stated that it is not able to run the service on the money provided by the CCG and it is not prepared to make up the shortfall.

In March 2016, it was reported that the start of this contract had been delayed by a month and began 1 May 2016; this was due to the need to finalise some arrangements, according to the CCG and Virgin Care.

The contract covers 38,000 people with long term conditions, as well as an estimated 6,000 elderly people. It measures performance against patient outcomes such as rate of falls, admissions into hospital, diabetes blood test management and patient mortality.

The contract has been dogged by contractual and financial issues. In March 2017, CCG board papers seen by the HSJ revealed that Virgin Care and East Staffordshire CCG were in dispute over contractual arrangements. This dispute has impacted on Burton Hospitals Foundation Trust; the trust is unable to agree a contract with Virgin Care under the prime provider model due to the CCG dispute.

HSJ reported that minutes from the Burton Hospitals’ board meeting on 12 January said: “The trust would have been in a position to sign the contract had it been able to reach an agreement with Virgin Care, however, this had not been possible…Virgin Care were discussing their contract issues with the CCG and a meeting had been scheduled between NHS England, NHS Improvement, Virgin Care and the CCG…Virgin Care was clear that its issues with the CCG would need to be resolved prior to entering into a contract agreement with the trust.” This could have a major impact on the Burton Hospitals Foundation Trust's finances.

In October 2017, HSJ reported that Virgin Care was demanding more money from the CCGs. No amount has been officially confirmed, but HSJ noted "that sources have told HSJ the private provider has asked for nearly £5m extra." According to HSJ in October 2018, the CCGs did not provide an extra £5 million to Virgin Care and as a result Virgin Care has terminated parts of the contract; the company no longer acts as a prime provider commissioning services such as hospital-based services, 111 and out-of-hours services. Virgin Care does, however, continue to provide the community services, which it has direct responsibility for, including specialist nursing, community nursing, care coordination and care navigation. The CCGs involved told HSJ that from June 2019 they would contract directly with the services, instead of Virgin sub-contracting.

Smaller contracts:

Other contract news

NHS and social care services for children in Devon

In July 2012 Virgin Care won a three year £131 million contract to provide a range of core NHS and social care services for children and adolescents in Devon. Extensions to this contract took place, but by 1 April 2019, Virgin Care had lost all the contracts for children's services in Devon.

The new contract was advertised in 2018, but Virgin lost out to an alliance of NHS providers and a not-for-profit organisation. The contract was eventually awarded to Devon Children and Families Alliance for community health and wellbeing services across the county. The contract is worth £166m over seven years, with the potential to extend for three years.

The alliance comprises the six main providers in the county: Torbay and South Devon Foundation Trust, Devon Partnership Trust, Royal Devon and Exeter FT, University Hospitals Plymouth Trust, Northern Devon Healthcare Trust, and Livewell Southwest (a community interest company).

Staffordshire Cancer and End-of-Life Care

Virgin Care, along with Optum and an Interserve consortium, was reported to be in the running for a ten year £535 million contract for end-of-life care in Staffordshire. A contract which was restarted after it was previously put on hold following the collapse of the UnitingCare contract in Cambridgeshire and Peterborough.

However, in July 2017 the process was abandoned entirely.

At the same time, another ten year contract in Staffordshire, this time worth £687 million and for coordinating cancer care, was being tendered. However in early April 2017 the process was cancelled over concerns of financial liability.

The procurement process for both the end-of-life care and cancer care since 2013 has cost the commissioners over £840,000.

Community services in Surrey

From April 2012 to the end of March 2017, Virgin Care had a contract worth £450 million to deliver community services across Surrey.

In 2016, the commissioners involved in healthcare in Surrey decided to break the contract into smaller contracts for the next round of procurement. By April 2016 three individual Surrey CCGs had already advertised separate contracts for community services. Virgin put in bids for at least two, although possibly for more.

Virgin was given preferred provider status for the £176 million adult community services for Guildford and Waverley CCG in August 2016. However, in February 2017 the CCG Governing Body reviewed the progress being made to mobilise the new service, and as a result it decided not to progress with Virgin and has since begun a reprocurement process; Virgin was given a six month interim contract to cover the time for the reprocurement.

Virgin Care also did not win the contract for children's community services in Surrey. However, in this case, Virgin Care began legal proceedings in November 2016 against the eight commissioning organisations involved.


Tax Avoidance

Since 2010 when Virgin Care was formed the company has not reported a profit but a loss each financial year. No profit means no tax is paid in the UK and this continued to be the case in the financial year up to end March 2019. However, Virgin Care’s position within the complex structure of Richard Branson’s empire has raised some questions about tax liabilities.

In March 2015, an investigation by Richard Murphy,a chartered accountant at Tax Research UK, highlighted the use of tax havens by Virgin Care and other private companies working with the NHS. The investigation found 13 holding companies, some of them offshore, between Virgin Care and its ultimate parent company, based in the British Virgin Islands, a tax haven.

Murphy’s research also found that Virgin Care borrows money solely from a Virgin holding company and reports that it will repay that loan, which will be corporation tax-deductible, when a profit starts to be recorded. That holding company is based in the UK but it, in turn, owes money to other parts of the Virgin business, whose ultimate parent company is in the British Virgin Islands. This type of corporate set-up has potential for reducing or eliminating the tax liabilities of operating companies; a company in the UK could always report a loss due to loan repayments to sister companies thereby never having to pay tax.

Virgin Care refute suggestions that the company will not pay tax at some point in the future.

Virgin's use of tax havens within its corporate structure, such as The British Virgin Islands, has led to controversy in the media. It also proved a component in a campaign against Virgin Care being awarded a contract with Bristol CCG for children’s community services. In the end the contract was awarded to a community interest group.

The whole campaign, however, highlighted a rule that many CCGs have adopted in their constitutions about the awarding of contracts to companies that use some form of tax-avoidance strategy, such as off-shore companies.

According to a report in The Independent in February 2016 Bristol CCG is now in the process of deleting the rule, after it was questioned during the tender in 2015 for children’s community services. Lawyers for the CCG reportedly feared that the rule discriminates against companies that are legally avoiding tax, thus allowing them to sue the NHS if they do not win the contract. There are a number of CCGs that are now reconsidering this type of clause in their constitution.

Care Quality Concerns

There are concerns with the way Virgin Care runs its GP services. The Sutherland Lodge practice in Chelmsford, Essex, was taken over by Virgin in July 2016 after the previous partners handed back their contracts following £400,000 funding cuts to their contract. Prior to the takeover, the practice was rated outstanding, but in May 2018 the Care Quality Commission (CQC) rated the surgery inadequate overall. The rating is based on an inspection carried out in December 2017 just 18 months after Virgin Care took over the practice. Virgin Care also received more money for the contract than the previous GPs.

Under Virgin Care the CQC rated Sutherland Lodge inadequate on four of the five key measures – the safe, effective, responsive and well-led categories – and rated it “requires improvement” in the “caring” category. The practice has been placed in special measures and if improvements are not made within six months Virgin Care could be stripped of the 10-year Alternative Provider Medical Services (APMS) contract it was awarded to run Sutherland Lodge.

There are also concerns over the way Virgin runs another GP practice in Essex; in October 2017 Nicholas Challen made an official complaint to NHS England about the treatment of his father prior to his death. He told the local newspaper that in his view "Virgin are running the surgery as a standalone profit centre, and cutting corners to make the numbers work rather than a public service, fit for purpose."

There are also issues with regard to care quality concerns one of Virgin Care’s biggest contracts. It came to light in October 2017 and was reported in The Bath Chronicle that Virgin Care managers had been asked to ‘hold off’ from contacting the CQC as the company struggled with IT issues, despite managers having a legal obligation to report concerns. As a result of these issues, in the first three months of the contract, “patients had appointments cancelled, letters and reports were not sent out, and nurses had problems updating patient records,” according to The Bath Chronicle.

Earlier in the year, in April 2017, the Wiltshire Times reported on the treatment by Virgin Care of a severely disabled girl in Wiltshire; Virgin Care took over community children’s health services in April 2016. Josselin Tilley, has a complex life-limiting syndrome; prior to the contract change, the family would be visited three nights a week by NHS carers and have bi-monthly respite visits. In mid-January their care package stopped, which has left them with no care at all for the past three months. The family has also not seen a consistent paediatrician. Virgin Care has told the family that “there have been no changes to the level of service provided”. The family’s concerns have been echoed by other families in the area.

There was another case reported in June 2019 from Wiltshire, where a five-year-old girl - Carmela Chillery-Watson - with muscular dystrophy fell short of regular physiotherapy sessions that she was previously receiving before Virgin Care took over NHS contracts. Carmela is now being offered physio sessions every 4-6 months reported her mother, Lucy Chillery-Watson. This has lead to Lucy having to research and do physio with her daughter herself as Carmela's disease progresses. Lucy has been emailing Virgin Care for over a year about the issue and they have claimed to be too short-staffed, with "not enough resources or funding". Considering Carmela has a progressive muscle disease and is offered physio every 4-6 months, a Virgin Care spokesperson said: “While there are some vacancies in our physio team locally, we still meet the needs of our patients and ensure that the care we provide meets the care plan put in place to help them."

Concerns over care quality began in 2012, when Channel 4's documentary series Dispatches focused on Virgin Care's business in a programme entitled 'Getting Rich on the NHS'. The programme reported on Virgin Care's clinic in Northampton, which patients claim has become over reliant on locum GPs and Virgin Care had failed in its commitment to extend opening hours.

The programme also highlighted problems in Teesside, where the company provides sexual health tests. The service repeatedly missed targets on the numbers of people screened for Chlamydia. A memo revealed staff were asked to take home testing kits to use on friends and family to help make the numbers up.

In September 2015 an inquest heard of the death in September 2013 of Madhumita Mandal of multiple organ failure and sepsis. Mrs Mandal visited the Virgin Care run urgent care centre in Croydon in agony and vomiting, according to her husband, where she was triaged by a receptionist with no medical training, as not seriously ill enough to see the A&E doctor but put on the list to see a nurse.

The senior coroner at the inquest said she would write to Croydon CCG, which buys in the Virgin Care service, with her concerns about the triage system, which gives receptionists with no medical training responsibility for deciding if patients need emergency treatment. Virgin Care are reported to have defended the use of a non-medically trained receptionist to triage patients and said that Mrs Mandal had been “correctly streamed”.

The problem with Virgin Care’s use of receptionists to triage patients had already been noted by CQC inspectors: Mrs Mandal died two months after a CQC inspection of the urgent care centre, in which the inspectors noted: "We were concerned that there was a risk of a patient with a serious illness or injury being wrongly streamed and their condition deteriorating." A&E doctors had also voiced fears about the Virgin Care centre's triage system, the inquest heard.

Labour MP for Dewsbury, Paula Sherriff, revealed under Parliamentary privilege in the House of Commons, that when she worked for Virgin Care the company forced patients to attend extra appointments to boost profits. Sherriff accused Virgin Care of insisting on “extra consultations before surgery, boosting their profits at the expense of the taxpayer and patient safety”.

Before she stood for parliament, Sherriff worked in Virgin Care’s dermatology service in West Yorkshire. She claims patients were obliged to book a second, follow-up appointment before receiving treatment – for a suspect mole, for example – when the NHS would previously have carried out the same work in a single booking. She added that this was among “many unethical practices” she had witnessed.

Interference in CCGs plans

In February 2016, the HSJ reported that Virgin Care had made a legal challenge over Hull CCGs plans for primary care provision in its area. Hull CCG wants to create geographical groups of practices, each operating as larger scale providers. However, the initial plan to create the groups, by inviting groups of GPs to take over practices currently run under time limited contracts, was challenged by Virgin Care.

Eight out of about 50 surgeries in Hull are run under alternative provider medical services (APMS) contracts, which are due to expire in March and three of these are run by Virgin Care. Hull CCG now has to undertake a full procurement process in four lots for the future provision of the primary medical care services currently provided through the APMS contracts. Critics note the additional cost that a full procurement process will place upon an already cash-strapped CCG. In March 2017, the four lots were awarded to new providers; Virgin Care did not bid for any of the lots.

As a result of losing the tender bidding process for a children's community care contract in Surrey, Virgin Care launched legal proceedings in November 2016 against all eight commissioning organisations involved in the contract. A spokesman for Virgin Care told HSJ that concerns about “serious flaws in the procurement process” prompted the company to launch proceedings.

Speaking about the current contract run by Virgin and the two social enterprises, Guildford and Waverley CCG’s Wellbeing and Health Scrutiny board said that children and young people had experienced “service variation with differing access for families…a well as gaps in service provision and variation in waiting times.”

The dispute was settled in November 2017 with a payment to Virgin Care by the CCGs involved. The amount actually paid to Virgin Care is unclear. HSJ saw details of a payment by NHS Surrey Downs in governing body papers, but these were removed from the website soon after. HSJ notes what happened as follows:

"However, governing body papers for NHS Surrey Downs – one of the six CCGs involved - have revealed that its “liability” in the case is £328,000. The sum was published this month in a finance paper covering October on the CCG’s website. The paper was uploaded earlier this week but subsequently removed after HSJ started to enquire about the settlement. A CCG spokesperson said the reference had been removed because “the level of detail…should not have been included in the report.” Payment was made by the six CCGs and one council involved and an August 2018 article in the Guardian puts the overall figure paid to Virgin as approximately £2 million.

In April 2017, it was revealed that Virgin Care is in dispute with East Staffordshire CCG over arrangements in the seven-year prime provider contract for frail elderly patients, people with long term conditions and intermediate care. The exact nature of the dispute had not been reported, but the dispute has had a knock-on affect on Burton Hospitals Foundation trust and could have implications for the finances of the trust.

Then in October 2017, HSJ reported that Virgin Care was demanding an extra £5 million from East Staffordshire CCG. According to HSJ in October 2018, the CCGs did not provide an extra £5 million to Virgin Care and as a result Virgin Care has terminated parts of the contract; the company will no longer act as a prime provider commissioning services such as hospital-based services, 111 and out-of-hours services.

Dear Reader,

If you like our content please support our campaigning journalism to protect health care for all.

Our goal is to inform people, hold our politicians to account and help to build change through evidence based ideas.

Everyone should have access to comprehensive healthcare, but our NHS needs support. You can help us to continue to counter bad policy, battle neglect of the NHS and correct dangerous mis-infomation.

Supporters of the NHS are crucial in sustaining our health service and with your help we will be able to engage more people in securing its future.

Please donate to help support our campaigning NHS research and  journalism.

Sign up for the latest stories and investigations

Something went wrong. Please check your entries and try again.

Dear Reader

This is a site compiled in the public interest, free of paywalls - we are non-profit making and rely on donations from users. if you like our content please help us to keep producing more and updating these pages.

Our journalists and researchers are working on this project because they share a belief that we should all have access to health and that the debates about health policy need an informed public.

Thank you for your support

NHS Support Federation team